On September 16, 2026, European Commission President von der Leyen opened her annual State of the Union address with the warning that “[a] fight for industrial capacities is shaping global competition“. Her speech indicated how the European Commission intends to respond to concerns about European competitiveness and economic security. Those priorities already appear in reforms and proposals such as the Draft Merger Guidelines and the proposed Industrial Accelerator Act (“Draft IAA”), alongside broader changes to foreign investment screening across the EU. The address therefore offers a useful guide to the considerations likely to shape EU merger control, competition enforcement and Member State investment screening. This post distils the implications for investors and businesses active in the EU.

Key Points

  • Competitiveness, resilience and economic security will shape EU merger control to some degree, as reflected in the Draft Merger Guidelines’ focus on scale, innovation and security of supply, as well as competition enforcement and foreign investment screening.
  • Foreign investment policy will continue to scrutinise strategic sectors and technologies—including AI, semiconductors, critical minerals, energy and defence—while enabling partnerships that build capacity, diversify supply chains and strengthen resilience.
  • Trusted international partnerships will increasingly shape foreign investment assessments, with greater weight on investors’ jurisdictions and strategic alignment with EU industrial policy.
  • Climate change and AI are identified as “tipping points” driving regulatory focus across sectors including energy and water infrastructure, agriculture and food, health, transport, advanced manufacturing, and defence and space.

European Competitiveness:  the omnipresent objective

Although President von der Leyen does not expressly use the word “competitiveness”, she frames her economic agenda around a “bold plan” for an EU in which companies can innovate, compete and grow. Her focus on scale, security of supply, sustainability and innovation provides the policy context for the competition and foreign investment implications discussed below.

Competition Policy Implications

The Draft Merger Guidelines are the clearest competition-policy expression of this agenda and the most significant development in EU merger control in two decades. Released in April 2026 for public feedback, they give greater weight to scale, innovation, resilience and security of supply in assessing whether transactions support European competitiveness. Sustainability may also feature more prominently, alongside traditional factors such as price effects.

President von der Leyen championed the overhaul of the Merger Guidelines.  Her address’ focus gives it further political impetus, with the Commission issuing formal objections on the same day to MMG’s proposed acquisition of Anglo American’s nickel assets over resilience and security-of-supply concerns. The Commission has concerns that MMG could divert low-carbon ferronickel supplies away from the EU.

The final text of the Draft Merger Guidelines, expected later this year, will determine how far resilience, scaling-up benefits and longer-term investment effects influence merger outcomes. President von der Leyen’s selective references to “scale”—focused on start-ups and collective defence capacity—are consistent with the Draft Merger Guidelines’ measured approach, which recognises that scale can be pro-competitive where it helps parties compete globally.

On competition policy, her call to unlock AI’s value “more responsibly” highlights the emerging debate over industry cooperation to develop safe AI. Executive Vice-President Ribera has invited companies to seek guidance on proposed initiatives, which could lead to further Commission comfort letters.

Foreign Investment Implications—industrial policy and partnerships

President von der Leyen’s call to help European companies compete globally “on a level playing field” and reduce strategic dependencies reflects the concerns behind the revamped Foreign Investment Screening Regulation (discussed here) and the Draft IAA. She also calls for “all tools at [the EU’s] disposal” to rebalance trade with China and reverse deindustrialisation.

The Draft IAA (discussed here), proposed in March 2026, remains under negotiation and has generated significant debate over its ‘Made in Europe’ criteria and value-creation requirements for certain foreign investments. Although President von der Leyen did not name the Draft IAA, her proposal for a European Corporation on Critical Raw Materials—to source and stockpile inputs for semiconductors, batteries and clean technologies—supports the rationale behind the Draft IAA and the EU’s wider economic security strategy.

The same concerns drove the harmonisation and enhanced cooperation introduced by the new Foreign Investment Screening Regulation. Member States can therefore be expected to scrutinise foreign investments in sectors President von der Leyen identifies as economic fundamentals for European industry and security, including clean energy, critical raw materials, finance, banking, AI, semiconductors and defence.

The address also calls for faster investment and closer EU cooperation, including through grid and storage investment, capital-markets reform and the Scaleup Europe Fund.

The address also frames economic security around trusted partnerships, not only adversary- and sector-based risks. While reaffirming the international rules-based system, President von der Leyen calls for strategic partnerships and “global coalitions” to strengthen resilience. Her proposal to deepen cooperation with Canada beyond CETA—covering critical minerals, batteries, AI, quantum technologies and cybersecurity—illustrates the approach.

This suggests that the origin and strategic context of an investment will increasingly matter in foreign investment screening. Although most Member State screening regimes remain formally origin-neutral, relationships with like-minded jurisdictions may carry greater weight alongside concerns about strategic dependencies and critical assets. Businesses navigating FDI reviews should therefore expect greater attention to investors’ jurisdictions and strategic alignment, even if Member States weigh partnership factors differently.

Critical sectors in focus—energy, artificial intelligence and downstream AI

President von der Leyen singles out two “tipping points” as critical to the EU’s future prosperity and security: climate change and AI.  These areas can, as a result, expect to attract heightened regulatory attention:

  • Energy and resources: Referring to heatwaves and water scarcity, she links climate resilience to the stability of agricultural and energy supply chains. Investments in water infrastructure, food security and adaptation technologies may therefore face heightened scrutiny where targeted assets support critical infrastructure or essential services – including both ordinary course-of-business operation and maintenance, as well as disaster prevention and response.
  • Artificial intelligence models: President von der Leyen describes AI as a “foundational layer” for the economy and security while warning of self-improving models and adversarial use. She proposes strengthening EU capabilities through public and private funding and working with “like minded” partners on model evaluation, verification, early warning and AI security. This language may inform how regulators assess AI-related investments from trusted partners.
  • AI applications: President von der Leyen distinguishes AI development from downstream applications, acknowledging that many leading AI developers are based outside the EU. She identifies five sectors for new industrial-AI initiatives, to be announced in November 2026: health, transport, agri-food, advanced manufacturing, and defence & space. Future regulation in these sectors can be expected to seek to protect high-value European data while facilitating its use and ensuring that economic value is created in the EU, consistent with the Draft IAA.

Looking beyond SOTEU

President von der Leyen’s address overall signals continuity, rather than a wholesale shift, in competition, merger control and foreign investment policy. The Draft Merger Guidelines will show how far scale and resilience influence merger outcomes, while investment screening is likely to focus more on resilience, climate preparedness, advanced AI and trusted partnerships. The November initiatives in health, transport, agri-food, advanced manufacturing, and defence and space will indicate whether the Commission builds incrementally on existing tools or pursues broader changes. Businesses should watch those initiatives and the next Commission merger and investment-screening decisions for the practical direction of travel.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of James Marshall James Marshall

James Marshall advises on all aspects of competition law and foreign direct investment (FDI) screening, with a focus on merger and FDI control, investigations and enforcement, commercial counselling, and abuse of dominance. He has strong experience in the life sciences, energy & infrastructure…

James Marshall advises on all aspects of competition law and foreign direct investment (FDI) screening, with a focus on merger and FDI control, investigations and enforcement, commercial counselling, and abuse of dominance. He has strong experience in the life sciences, energy & infrastructure, digital and technology, financial services, and sports sectors.

James regularly leads cross-border teams to steer clients through both the merger control and FDI aspects of major global deals. Clients turn to James to help them navigate complex global transactions, and to find innovative solutions to antitrust enforcement and counselling matters.

Earlier in his career, James worked with the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), where he helped develop the UK’s antitrust and regulated sector enforcement regimes. He also practiced for several years in the Asia-Pacific region and has experience advising on competition, regulatory, and public policy issues in Asia and the Middle East.

James is a former Chair of the Competition Section Advisory Committee of the Law Society of England and Wales. He is highly recommended by Legal 500 and is recognized as leading adviser by Who’s Who Legal. James is dual qualified in England and Wales, and the Republic of Ireland.

Photo of Laurie-Anne Grelier Laurie-Anne Grelier

Laurie-Anne Grelier assists global companies, especially Asian multinationals, with navigating complex areas of European competition law, including antitrust and cartel investigations, the clearance of mergers, the structuring of distribution, collaborative and other commercial arrangements, and issues related to abuse of dominant position. Ms.

Laurie-Anne Grelier assists global companies, especially Asian multinationals, with navigating complex areas of European competition law, including antitrust and cartel investigations, the clearance of mergers, the structuring of distribution, collaborative and other commercial arrangements, and issues related to abuse of dominant position. Ms. Grelier also assists these companies in litigation before the European Courts, as well as with state aid and trade matters.

Photo of Ross Evans Ross Evans

Ross Evans is a leading foreign investment controls lawyer, who focuses on helping clients navigate the shifting global landscape of foreign direct investment (FDI) and national security reviews and regulations, and other regimes providing for security and public interest related geopolitical interventions in…

Ross Evans is a leading foreign investment controls lawyer, who focuses on helping clients navigate the shifting global landscape of foreign direct investment (FDI) and national security reviews and regulations, and other regimes providing for security and public interest related geopolitical interventions in corporate, commercial and financial transactions.

His practice covers foreign investment and international trade laws, encompassing FDI, national security and public interest review and approvals, inbound and outbound investment screening, and export control/sanctions matters, alongside related licensing and compliance and internal and regulator-facing investigations.

Ross regularly advises major multinational companies and a broad range of strategic and financial investors. With nearly a decade of global experience managing engagement with UK, EU and international authorities, and a deep understanding of the trade and investment issues connected to critical and strategic assets and technologies, Ross provides strategic and commercial guidance to clients, general counsel and C-suite decision makers, across industries including technology and telecommunications, infrastructure, life sciences, aerospace and defence, engineering, and financial services.

Ross frequently presents on legal developments and trends to industry bodies and trade groups in the United Kingdom and internationally. He has worked in Singapore and Stockholm, and has spent over a year on two separate secondments with a multinational technology company in London and California.

As an elected member of the National Security Committee of techUK, a technology industry trade association, Ross works alongside committee members drawn from the technology and security sector to break down the impact of new law and policy and to advance engagement and understanding between industry and government in the UK. In connection with his expertise in sensitive and emerging technologies, Ross provided industry focused input at the request of the UK Government on drafting secondary legislation and guidance in connection with the UK’s National Security and Investment Act (NSIA).

Photo of Zeyang Gao Zeyang Gao

Zeyang Gao advises clients on a broad range of competition law, foreign investment screening and national security matters. He has extensive experience advising multinational companies on complex cross-border transactions across the technology, media and telecommunications, healthcare and life sciences, and energy sectors. His…

Zeyang Gao advises clients on a broad range of competition law, foreign investment screening and national security matters. He has extensive experience advising multinational companies on complex cross-border transactions across the technology, media and telecommunications, healthcare and life sciences, and energy sectors. His practice includes coordinating global merger control and foreign investment approval strategies, advising on merger and antitrust investigations before the UK Competition and Markets Authority and the European Commission, and assisting clients with national security and foreign investment reviews in the United Kingdom and across Europe.

Zeyang has a particular interest in helping Chinese companies navigate the UK and EU regulatory landscape.